Lighter

Lighter

On Reopening of the Court after vacation

Judge to Lawyer: 

Today Board is too light.

Lawyer to Judge: 

Yes, My lord has become Lighter too.

Advocate

Ajay Amitabh Suman

Ready for Argument

Ready for Argument 

Judge to a Lawyer: 

Are you ready for the argument?

Lawyer: 

Yes my Lord, but not for your questions.

Advocate Ajay Amitabh Suman

Nothing comes in this country without paying hefty cost, education too

There was court order from Delhi High Court to effect dasti Service on the Defendants through Court Server. It has to be done through court Server within a week.

Dasti service is a form of legal service that is carried out through the court server. It involves delivering a court order or legal notice to a defendant through a court-appointed official. 

In this particular case, the Delhi High Court had ordered that dasti service be carried out on the defendants within a week. However, due to the overload of work on the process server branch, the court clerk was unable to get the work done in time.

Though my court clerk was trying to get this effect as soon as possible, however , as the process server brach was loaded with too much work, I had to go mention the matter to Registrar and  get the work done.

Frustration of my court court was apparent from his face. Obviously he was regretting of not being a lawyer. He was also regretting to coming from a farmer family. Though he was sharp, but perhaps because of his poor family back groud , he had to started to do the job at the early stage of life.

I consoled him and encouraged him to make his son lawyer. He again laughed and said, Sir We can not afford high tutuion fee of private school. And every body knows the situation of government school. In this country poor people are meant to remain poor. 

Obviously he was having desire to  make his son a lawyer, but was unable to afford the high tuition fees of private schools. This highlights the larger issue of the high cost of education in India, and the lack of opportunities available to those from poorer backgrounds.

Nothing in this country comes without paying the hefty fee, the justice too, the education too. If some one wants a good education, he is supposed to make heady payment to schools. With Court also, same thing is true.

The Indian Constitution guarantees the right to education for all, but in reality, access to quality education is limited to those who can afford it. 

Private schools and educational institutions have become increasingly widespread across the country, creating a divide between those who can afford quality education and those who cannot. 

This is a result of the failure of the government to provide good quality education in government schools. The lack of investment in government schools is a reflection of the wider issues within the Indian education  system. 

The government has failed to provide adequate resources and support to ensure that the justice system is functioning effectively. As a result, the burden of ensuring justice falls on the shoulders of overworked court officials, who are often unable to cope with the demands placed on them.

Though Indian constitution promises the right of education to all, but why Government is not be able to provide good Government school? How the promises, which has been made by the Indian Constitution, can be fulfilled? Why private schools and educational institutions are spreading line hydra across the country?

The high cost of education in India and the lack of opportunities for those from poorer backgrounds also serve as a reminder of the need for greater investment in education and other public services. Only by addressing these issues can India truly guarantee justice and equality for all.

Ajay Amitabh Suman

Delayed Justice is no justice

The concept of justice is an integral aspect of any society, and it is the fundamental responsibility of the judicial system to provide justice to the victims of crimes. However, the Indian judicial system's delay in delivering justice has become a recurring issue, leading to a growing dissatisfaction among the citizens. The recent incident where a rape victim was convicted after 17 years of trial is a harsh reminder of the need for speedy justice delivery.

As I took a sip of Tea in Delhi High Court canteen, I saw a news flash on the television that a rape victim was convicted after 17 years of trial. The news was disturbing, and my curiosity led me to have a conversation with the victim. The victim, contrary to my expectations, was not happy or relieved with the decision. The long delay in the decision-making process left her with a feeling of despair. The quote, "Justice delayed is justice denied," rightly came to my mind.

The Indian judicial system has come under scrutiny in recent years due to the prolonged process of delivering justice. The lengthy trials, procedural delays, and the backlog of cases have resulted in the justice system becoming frustrating and an arduous process for the victims. The incident mentioned above is just one among many such cases that linger on for years, and the victims remain bereft of justice.

In a democracy, it is the judiciary's responsibility to protect the human rights of every citizen and bring justice to victims of crimes. In the face of incompetency and inefficiency in the justice delivery, it falls upon the judiciary, the legal fraternity, and the government to take swift and constructive steps to restore the public's faith in the judicial system.

The process of speedy justice delivery is a collective responsibility of the advocates and the Hon'ble Judges. Advocates play an essential role in ensuring that the justice delivery process is swift, as they are the primary representatives of their clients. They can file petitions, put case summaries in front of the judges and present the evidence that aids in the conviction of the criminal. They play a vital role in expediting the judicial process by presenting the cases in front of the judges convincingly.

On the other hand, Hon'ble Judges have the responsibility to ensure that justice is delivered on time. During the hearings, judges can ensure efficient and thorough hearings, streamline the documentation process, and appropriately allocate resources to expedite the trials. The judges must provide specific timelines for the trials and follow due diligence, assertiveness, and fairness during the judicial processes.

The judicial system needs to thrive on the principle of justice delivery that upholds the dignity and the rights of the victims. The judicial processes need to be streamlined and made efficient, with a priority placed on speedy and just convictions. Public faith can be restored in the judiciary only when the victims' voices are heard, and the long-pending cases are dealt with swiftly.

Furthermore, the government needs to put in place adequate resources to enable the timely processing of cases. The judicial system requires the allocation of additional judges, adequate infrastructure, and the creation of specialized tribunals to deal with specific cases. These measures will go a long way in providing relief to the citizens seeking justice.

The recent incident in Delhi High Court canteen reiterated the need for speedy justice delivery in India. Justice delayed is justice denied. It is the responsibility of the advocates, Hon'ble judges, and the government to take cognizance of the matter and work towards streamlining the justice delivery process. It is only then that the judiciary will be successful in rebuilding the public's faith in the justice system, and victims will receive justice on time.

Justice denied is a consequence of delayed proceedings, which renders any decision useless if it comes too late. Therefore, it is the responsibility of both advocates and Hon'ble Judges to expedite the justice delivery system to maintain the people's trust in the judiciary.

If a Writer Writes Wrongly, he wrongs the history

One of my friend was sharing his experience as a Local Commissioner. Few days ago my friend was appointed as Local Commissioner by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in a matter pertaining to Intellectual Property Right. He happened to visit a village in Haryana.

He further told me that at a Public Place , this quotation was mentioned:

"Ḍhol ganvār shūdra pashu nārī। sakal tāḍanā ke adhikārī"

[Drum, illiterate, Shudra , animal and  woman deserve Gross Chastisement]

My friend was further saying that at the bottom of the afore mentioned Quote , it mentioned, From Ramayan by Tulsidasa.

He said that though Tulsidasa spoken this quotes from the mouth of Sea God, still fact remains that People often misquote this statement.

The statement in question was a distorted version of a line from Tulsidasa's Ramayan. The original line was spoken by the Sea God, who warns Lord Ram that even the most marginalized individuals deserve respect and protection. However, the painted version of the statement was altered to suggest that certain groups, including women and individuals of lower castes, should be harshly punished.

This incident highlights the importance of accuracy and responsibility in writing. As my friend noted, writers must be aware that their words have the potential to shape societal beliefs and attitudes for centuries to come. If a writer propagates misinformation or bigotry, they are committing a crime against society.

Moreover, writers must ensure that their words are not taken out of context or distorted in a way that misrepresents their original meaning. The altered version of Tulsidasa's statement is a prime example of this issue. The original message of compassion and inclusivity was twisted into a call for violence and oppression.

It is imperative that writers take responsibility for the impact of their words. In a world where misinformation spreads rapidly through social media and other channels, it is more important than ever to ensure that information is accurate, balanced, and ethical.

The power of writing is undeniable, but so too is its responsibility. We must all do our part to ensure that the words we produce are used for good, not harm. By spreading accurate information, combating misinformation, and advocating for inclusivity and respect, we can help to create a better world through writing.

The Responsibility of write is much more. A Writer must realize that whatever they write or propagate , it is going to have lasting effect for centuries. It a writer writes some thing wrong, he is actually comitting a crime.

The Right of same sex couples to adopt a Child

The right of same-sex couples to adopt a child is a subject of fierce debates globally. Some countries fully recognize the rights of same-sex couples to adopt a child, while others are still contemplating it.

Though same-sex marriage has not yet been recognized by the Indian Legislature, a significant step has been taken in this direction by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the Judgement namely Navtej Singh V. Union of India, where Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) has been struck down by the Supreme Court.

This was a landmark judgment in India's legal history, as it decriminalized homosexuality and recognized the rights of the LGBTQ community. The
afore mentioned Judgement struck down the penal consequences of Section 377 India Penal Code, in relation to consensual sex between two adults. It was great relief to LGBTQ community. But right to adopt a child for such same sex couple still remains a distance possibility.

As per the Indian law, adoption is governed by the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, and Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956. Neither of the acts specifically prohibits same-sex couples from adopting a child. However, there is no mention of same-sex couples either, creating a legal vacuum that leaves the matter open to interpretation.

Section 2(2) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, defines adoption as the process through which the adopted child is permanently separated from his biological parent or guardian and becomes the legitimate child of his adoptive parents. In other words, adoption creates a permanent legal relationship between the adoptive parent and the adopted child.

On the other hand, the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, governs adoption rights for Hindus only. Section 8 of the Act provides that any Hindu male who is of sound mind and is not a minor may adopt a child. However, if the adoptive parent is a married couple, both should give their consent to the adoption.

The lack of clarity regarding same-sex couples' adoption rights in India has led to a series of court battles. In April 2019, the Madras High Court held that a lesbian couple could not be denied the right to parent a child merely because of their sexual orientation.

The court directed the Tamil Nadu State government to consider their application for adoption as per the guidelines. The case arose from the petition filed by the couple seeking to adopt a child.

The couple had married in the United States and returned to India to start a family. The court observed that the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act did not bar same-sex couples from adopting a child.

This Judgement came in the year 2019, titled as Arun Kumar v Inspector General of Registration, Tamil Nadu , where by the Hon'ble High Court of Madras has interpreted the term bride to include the transwoman also.

However, in another case, the Karnataka High Court held that a gay couple could not be granted the right to adopt a child. The court refused to consider their plea, citing that the Indian law did not recognize same-sex marriage.

The case arose when two American men, in a committed relationship, sought to adopt a child through surrogacy in India. The court observed that the couple could not be granted the right to adopt the child as the Indian law did not recognize same-sex marriage.

The contrasting judgements of the Madras High Court and the Karnataka High Court highlight the conflicting nature of the Indian law regarding same-sex couple's adoption rights.

Internationally, many countries have already granted the right of adoption to same-sex couples. In the United States, same-sex marriage was legalized in 2015, granting same-sex couples the legal right to adopt a child.

In Canada, same-sex couples have been legally permitted to adopt a child since 1999. In Germany, same-sex couples have been granted the right to adopt a child since 2017.

In Australia, the Parliament passed a law in 2017, legalizing same-sex marriage, granting same-sex couples the right of adoption. Progress has been slower in some countries like Italy, where same-sex couples are still prohibited from adopting a child.

Live-in relationships have also become more socially acceptable in India in recent years, which is a positive development. However, the question remains as to whether same-sex couples should be allowed to adopt children or not. This issue has generated a lot of debate and controversy in India, with proponents and opponents presenting arguments for their respective positions.

The primary argument against same-sex couples adopting children is that children need both a mother and a father figure to grow up in a balanced and healthy environment.

Opponents of same-sex adoption also argue that it goes against Indian cultural values and traditions. However, there is no empirical evidence to support these claims, and they are based on stereotypes and prejudice.

On the other hand, proponents of same-sex adoption argue that every individual, regardless of their sexual orientation, should have the right to adopt a child if they can provide a loving and nurturing environment for the child.

There is no evidence to suggest that same-sex parents are any less capable of raising children than opposite-sex parents. Moreover, denying same-sex couples the right to adopt is a violation of their fundamental human rights.

The right of same-sex couples to adopt a child remains a contentious issue, with debates raging on its legality and morality. India's legal system lacks clarity on this issue, leading to varying interpretations and court battles. While some courts have upheld the right of same-sex couples to adopt a child, others have denied it.

In light of the international trend towards granting the right of adoption to same-sex couples, India may need to revisit its laws to provide clarity on this issue.

Though India has made significant progress in recent years in recognizing the rights of the LGBTQ community. However, the societal attitudes towards same-sex relationships and adoption are still evolving. This is one aspect of matter. The another aspect of this issue is that making laws is one thing, but changing societal attitudes is another.

For instance, the Sati system, also known as the practice of widow burning or self-immolation, was a deeply ingrained and longstanding cultural practice in India. Raja Ram Mohan Roy's efforts to abolish the Sati system were met with resistance from various sections of the Indian society.

Through these efforts, Raja Ram Mohan Roy was able to gradually persuade the Indian society to accept the reform of the Sati system. In 1829, the British Governor-General Lord William Bentick passed a law banning the practice of Sati, which was met with widespread protests and violent reactions from the traditionalists.

However, over time, the ban was enforced and gradually accepted by most parts of the society, leading to the eventual eradication of the Sati system. Before banning Sati Pratha, Raja Ram Mohan Roy had to make the Indian Society accept such a reform. Only after that did the ban of the Sati system become successful.

Similarly, in spite of the regulations outlined in India's Dowry Prohibition Act, passed in 1961, which forbids the giving or receiving by either party of any money, property, or any other valuable thing, the Dowry system continues to exist.

Other laws, such as the Domestic Violence Act of 2005 and the Protection of Women Against Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Act 2013, have been put in place to address aspects of the Dowry system, but they have proved futile in stopping it.

Until society acknowledges the devastating effects of this tradition and the need to condemn it, the Dowry system will persist. It ultimately requires a change in attitudes and beliefs, and it all starts with raising awareness and standing together to demand a better world where there is no room for dangerous systems like Dowry.

Therefore, it is essential to make the Indian society accept the rights of same-sex couples to adopt a child, and merely making laws will not serve the purpose. It is crucial to start a dialogue and raise awareness about the positive aspects of same-sex adoption and how it can benefit the child. This can be achieved through media campaigns, public debates, and community outreach programs.

In the present day scenario same-sex adoption appears to be a complex issue that requires careful consideration and dialogue. Every individual, regardless of their sexual orientation, should have the right to adopt a child if they can provide a loving and nurturing environment for the child.

It is crucial to change societal attitudes towards same-sex adoption through education, awareness, and dialogue. Only then can we truly create an inclusive society that respects the rights of all individuals. Without creating the acceptance and recognition from the Society, the law will remain toothless.

Ajay Amitabh Suman

The Right to Free Speech can not grant right to the Citizen , the right of hate Speech.

The right to free speech is a fundamental right that is enshrined in most democratic societies around the world. It is a right that enables individuals to express their opinions, ideas, and beliefs without fear of censorship or retribution. However, the right to free speech is not an absolute right and is subject to reasonable restrictions, especially when it comes to hate speech.

Last Tuesday, the Supreme Court of India made a significant statement regarding hate speech. The court declared that the maintenance of communal harmony in the country is a fundamental requirement, and therefore, it is essential to avoid hate speeches.

Hate speech is a type of speech that promotes or encourages hatred, discrimination, or violence against individuals or groups based on their race, religion, nationality, gender, or other personal characteristics. Hate speech is a severe violation of human rights, as it can cause harm, fear, and division in society.

The Supreme Court's statement is a welcome move, as hate speech has become a growing concern in India. In recent years, there has been a significant rise in hate speech, particularly on social media platforms. This kind of speech not only incites violence but also polarizes society by creating a divide between communities.

Hate speech has no place in a democratic society that values diversity, inclusion, and equality. It creates a hostile environment for individuals who belong to marginalized communities and can lead to increased prejudice and discrimination. Hate speech can also lead to physical violence and harm, as it can incite individuals to commit acts of violence against others.

The court knows  the impact of words on people's lives. Words have the power to heal, inspire, and unite people, but they can also divide and hurt. Hate speech is a form of violence, as it can cause emotional and psychological harm to individuals and communities. Moreover, hate speech can lead to physical violence, which can cause injuries and even death.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) recognizes this and provides for the restriction of freedom of expression when it is necessary to protect the rights and freedoms of others.

Furthermore, hate speech is not protected under the right to free speech. The ICCPR recognizes that hate speech is a form of speech that is not protected under the right to free speech. It states that "any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law."

In India, hate speech is prohibited under various laws, including the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, and the Information Technology Act. These laws aim to prevent hate speech and protect the rights and freedoms of individuals who belong to marginalized communities.

The Supreme Court's comment is also significant in the current political climate, where there is a growing polarization between different communities. Hate speech is often used as a tool by politicians to gain support from their respective communities, leading to further division and tension.

The court emphasizes the importance of promoting communal harmony in the country. Communal harmony refers to the peaceful coexistence of different communities, with mutual respect and understanding for each other's beliefs and practices. Communal harmony is essential for the development and progress of a society, as it creates a conducive environment for individuals to live and work.

Hate speech infringes upon the rights and freedoms of others and can lead to violence and harm. The right to free speech is subject to reasonable restrictions that protect the rights and freedoms of others.

The Court's remark on hate speech is not just a reminder to individuals but also to the government and law enforcement agencies. The government has a duty to protect its citizens from hate speech, and law enforcement agencies must take strict action against those who propagate hate speech.

However, it is important to note that the right to free speech is a fundamental right in India. The Constitution of India guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression, subject to reasonable restrictions. Therefore, the government and law enforcement agencies must balance the right to free speech with the need to prevent hate speech.

Hate speech infringes upon the rights and freedoms of others and can lead to violence and harm. The right to free speech is subject to reasonable restrictions that protect the rights and freedoms of others.

This opinion on hate speech is a step towards promoting communal harmony and ensuring that individuals and communities are not harmed by hate speech. It is crucial for individuals, the government, and law enforcement agencies to take this statement seriously and work towards creating a society that respects diversity and promotes unity. By doing so, we can ensure that India remains a country that values peace, harmony, and progress.

The Digital Mosquitos:The Unsolicited Calls

Last Friday, I was returning to his office after finishing my matters in Delhi High Court. I felt relieved as the case I had been working on for months had finally come to an end. 

As I was walking towards his office, he noticed a crowd of my friends standing in front of a TV screen, watching the news. Curious, I went over to see what was going on.

As I approached, I saw that everyone was talking about Rahul Gandhi, who had apparently been removed from his position as a member of parliament. I was surprised to hear this news, as I had not been following politics closely. 

However, before I could join in the conversation, I was interrupted by a young lady who introduced herself as a social reformer. She claimed to be working for the welfare of blind people and was asking for donations.

I wasn't interested in donating at first, but the young lady was persistent, and I eventually gave in and donated a small amount through PAYTM. I forgot about the incident soon after and continued with my work at the office.

However, my peace was soon disrupted as I began receiving several unsolicited calls and messages from unknown people asking for donations.

I would receive at least 5-6 such calls daily, and they would disturb me even during my arguments in court. The constant ringing of my phone felt like the buzzing of mosquitoes, and I found it difficult to concentrate on my work.

I soon realized that the social reformer I had donated to had likely given my phone number to other organizations or individuals looking for donations.

I felt frustrated and annoyed that my privacy had been violated in this way. I tried to block the numbers, but new ones kept appearing, and I couldn't seem to get rid of them.

As the days went by, I became increasingly irritated by the constant calls and messages. I found it hard to focus on my work and began to feel like I was being harassed.

 I tried to take legal action against the organizations that were contacting me, but it proved to be a difficult and time-consuming process.

Finally, I researched ways to prevent unsolicited calls and messages and came across a few helpful tips.  

I also installed a call blocker app on my phone, which allowed me to block specific numbers and even entire area codes. These helped to reduce the number of unwanted calls I received.

With these measures in place, I was finally able to get some peace and quiet. I no longer felt like I was being bombarded by digital mosquitoes, and I could focus on my work without any distractions.

Now  I was at ease to have found a solution to my problem and vowed to be more careful in the future when donating to charitable organizations.

If educated Person like us will not raise a fingure, then who will?

I happen to visit my relative's house in a small town for a family function. It was a Mundan ceremony of his newborn son. I had heard about this ceremony, which signifies the new life of a child, but I had never attended one before. I was curious to know more about this ritual and the significance it held in the lives of people.

As I entered the house, I saw that it was beautifully decorated with flowers and lights. The room was filled with the fragrance of incense sticks, and I could hear the old ladies singing the auspicious songs. They all wore traditional dresses, and their faces glowed with joy and excitement.

My friend greeted me with a smile and introduced me to his wife and their newborn son. The baby looked adorable in his tiny clothes, and I couldn't help but smile at him. My friend then explained to me the significance of the Mundan ceremony and how it was supposed to be a milestone in his son's life.

He told me that shaving the head of a newborn child was considered auspicious in their culture. It was believed to be a way of getting rid of the negative energies and promoting good health and fortune. He also mentioned that the ceremony was a way of introducing the child to the family and friends and seeking their blessings.

As we were talking, an elderly lady entered the room, and my friend introduced her as his grandmother. She was the eldest member of the family and was responsible for conducting the ceremony. She began instructing my friend and his wife about the procedure of the ceremony, and I could see how excited and happy they were.

A small pire was lit in the center of the room, and the smoke started spreading all around. The baby started crying, and my friend's wife became anxious. However, in the name of tradition, they were asked to continue with the ceremony, and the child was given a small shave on his head.

I was shocked to see how the baby was made to suffer in the name of customs and traditions. I couldn't bear to see the little one crying, and I immediately went to my friend and asked him why he was keeping his son weeping. I explained to him that this practice was outdated and could harm the child's well-being.

He looked at me with a confused expression, and I could see that he was torn between his beliefs and his child's comfort. I explained to him that we should follow traditions, but not at the cost of someone's pain and suffering. I told him that education had taught us to think critically and not blindly follow customs.

My words struck a chord with him, and he realized that he had been wrong. He apologized to his wife and child and promised to make things better. He thanked me for opening his eyes and making him realize the importance of being responsible and conscious towards their child's well-being.

The ceremony ended with a small feast, and everyone blessed the child. I could see that my friend and his wife were relieved and happy, and the baby had stopped crying. As I was leaving, my friend came up to me and thanked me once again. He told me that he had learned a valuable lesson and that he would make sure that his child's well-being was always his top priority.

I left his house with a sense of satisfaction, knowing that I had made a small but significant contribution to someone's life. I realized that traditions and customs were an essential part of our culture, but we should never forget to evaluate them critically and be responsible towards our actions.

If you yearn, he will make you learn

Success is a term that everyone wants to achieve in their life. It can be in any field, be it personal or professional. However, the journey towards success is not always easy, and it requires a lot of hard work, dedication, and most importantly, self-belief. Sometimes, even after putting in all the efforts, we fail to achieve what we desire, and that's when we start doubting ourselves.

If you are in a similar situation and not getting success in your life, it means certainly there is some lacuna in you yearning. The first thing you need to do is to identify what's lacking and work on it. It can be your skills, your mindset, your approach towards your goals, or any other factor that's hindering your progress.

The most crucial factor that determines your success is your desire to achieve it. If you desire strong enough, nobody can stop you from learning. Your desire will fuel your efforts and push you to work harder towards your goals. It will keep you motivated even when the going gets tough.

Let's take some examples from history to understand this better. Eklavya, a character from the epic Mahabharata, is a great inspiration to all those who believe in themselves. When Dronacharya refused to teach him archery because he belonged to a lower caste, Eklavya didn't give up on his dream. He built a statue of Dronacharya and started practicing archery in front of it. His determination was so strong that he became a skilled archer without any formal training.

Another example is Maharshi Ramanna, who realized God himself. He spent years meditating and contemplating, and his desire to know the truth was so strong that he finally achieved enlightenment. Similarly, Karna, a character from the epic Mahabharata, desired strong enough to become the greatest archer. He even became a disciple of Lord Parashurama and learned the art of archery from him.

Jagadish Chandra Bose is yet another inspiring personality who proved life in Plant himself. He was a scientist who conducted several experiments to prove that plants have life. His desire to know the truth was so strong that he didn't stop until he achieved his goal.

These examples show that if you desire strong enough, you can achieve anything in life. Your determination, hard work, and self-belief are the key ingredients for success. It doesn't matter if you come from a humble background, face challenges, or lack resources. If your desire is strong, nothing can stop you from achieving your dreams.

If you are not getting success in your life, it's time to introspect and identify what's lacking. Once you know what's holding you back, work on it with all your heart and soul. Believe in yourself, have a strong desire to achieve your goals, and don't give up until you succeed. Remember, success is not a destination; it's a journey, and it's up to you to make it a beautiful one.

Why to Wail, When Gurus Fail

 Why to get disturbed when Guru goes wrong. After all Guru is not the Goal. It means to say that Guru is helpful in the path of God-realization, not the destination. There is only a means in the worship of a seeker, not an end. Sometimes God tests the seeker by sending him to wrong gurus. If Asaram, Ram Rahim, Guru Rampal, Nityanand etc have done wrong things, then they are also facing the consequences.

These gurus always talked about truthful conduct, celibacy, honest service. However, he himself could not follow those ideals in his life. So what? What stops you from following the ideals told by him. It is not necessary that the coach should also be the best to produce the best players. Most of the best coaches have been ordinary players. Like a flamingo, a man should drink only the lotus flower of spirituality that came out of the mouth of these so-called religious leaders, not the mire of their downtrodden character.

God does not become wrong if the Guru is wrong. The destination does not change if the path is wrong. Man has always been free to change course. The wrong teacher is just a test being taken by God on you. If your faith does not waver, you will definitely reach your destination. It is not necessary for the teacher to be right, but it is very important for the disciple to remain right.

The relationship between a guru and their disciple is one of the most sacred relationships in the spiritual realm. The guru is seen as a guide, a mentor, and a source of wisdom for the seeker on the path to God-realization. However, as humans, even gurus are prone to making mistakes and falling prey to their own weaknesses. This can be disheartening and disillusioning for their disciples who have put their faith in them. However, it is important to remember that the guru is not the goal, but merely a means to the goal.

The goal of spiritual practice is to attain God-realization, to merge with the divine, and to transcend the cycle of birth and death. The guru is there to provide guidance, support, and wisdom to the seeker on this path. However, the guru is not the destination. The destination is God-realization, and this can be attained even if the guru goes wrong.

In fact, sometimes God tests the seeker by sending them to the wrong guru. This is a way to test the seeker's faith and devotion. If the seeker's faith is strong, they will realize that the guru is only a means to the goal, and they will not be deterred by the guru's mistakes. They will continue on the path, following the ideals that the guru taught them, even if the guru themselves did not follow those ideals.

It is important to remember that just because a guru goes wrong, it does not mean that their teachings are wrong. The teachings themselves may be valid and true, even if the guru did not live up to them. It is up to the disciple to follow the teachings and embody them in their own life. As the saying goes, "Practice what your teacher teaches, not what your teacher does."

It is also important to remember that the consequences of one's actions cannot be escaped. If a guru has done wrong things, they will face the consequences of their actions, both in this life and in the afterlife. It is not for us to judge them, but rather to focus on our own spiritual practice and growth.

It is true that the teacher does not have to be perfect to be effective. Many great coaches in sports were not themselves great players. Similarly, many great gurus may have had their own shortcomings and weaknesses. However, it is important to use discernment and judgment when choosing a guru. It is important to choose a guru who embodies the ideals and teachings that they espouse, and who lives a life of integrity and honesty.

In conclusion, the guru is not the goal, but merely a means to the goal of God-realization. Even if the guru goes wrong, the teachings themselves may still be valid and true. It is up to the disciple to embody those teachings in their own life, regardless of whether or not the guru lived up to them. The wrong guru may be a test from God, and if the seeker's faith is strong, they will continue on the path to the ultimate goal. It is not necessary for the guru to be perfect, but it is important to choose a guru who embodies the teachings they espouse.

Why not to ban Polythene Manufacturers

Last Sunday was a typical lazy day for me. I was lounging in the living room, scrolling through social media when I suddenly smelled the tantalizing aroma of something being fried in the kitchen. Curious, I got up and walked towards the source of the smell.

My mother was standing at the stove, cooking up a storm. I could see that she had made some oily food, which was sizzling in the pan. Without thinking twice, I reached out and grabbed a piece, popping it into my mouth.

It was delicious, but I noticed that my mother didn't seem to be enjoying it as much. In fact, she had a pained expression on her face. She told me that she had also eaten the same food, and now she was feeling sick.

I started to panic. I knew I had to take her to the doctor. We rushed to the nearest hospital, where the doctor examined her and diagnosed her with food poisoning. He prescribed some medication and advised her to drink plenty of fluids, especially fruit juice.

I quickly made my way to the nearest fruit shop to buy some juice. When I got there, I asked the shopkeeper to give me a bag to carry the fruit in. To my surprise, he refused, saying that polythene bags had been banned and that I would have to bring my own bag.

I was puzzled. I had just passed by another fruit shop on the way, and they were selling fruit in polythene bags. I asked the shopkeeper about it, and he replied that he was paying a monthly fee to the food inspector, so he didn't have to worry about the ban. He also added that the government should be banning the factories that manufacture polythene bags instead of imposing penalties on shopkeepers.

I was taken aback by his response. His words made me think about the larger issue at hand. Why was the government only imposing penalties on shopkeepers who used polythene bags instead of banning the manufacture of these bags altogether? Wasn't it time to take more drastic measures to protect our environment and health?

As I left the fruit shop, I continued to ponder over these questions. It was clear that we needed to take responsibility for our actions and find ways to reduce our carbon footprint. It was time to take action before it was too late.

The Legal Age for Committing illegality

The consumption of substances such as tobacco, alcohol, and gambling has long been a part of human culture. However, it is no secret that these habits can lead to negative health and social consequences. Despite the harmful effects associated with these activities, many countries have a legal minimum age for their consumption. This raises the question: why do we allow people to indulge in such activities after a certain age, even when they can never be beneficial?

Let us first examine the effects of smoking. Cigarette smoke contains over 7,000 chemicals, of which at least 69 are known to cause cancer. Smoking is the leading cause of preventable death worldwide and is linked to numerous health problems such as heart disease, lung cancer, and respiratory illnesses. Smoking is also associated with reduced fertility and increased risk of birth defects in infants born to mothers who smoke during pregnancy. In light of these harmful effects, it is clear that smoking can never be beneficial to anyone.

Now let's take a look at gambling. While it may seem harmless, gambling can lead to addiction, financial problems, and psychological distress. Gambling addiction is a serious issue that can lead to severe financial and personal problems. Those who gamble regularly can experience negative effects on their mental health, such as depression, anxiety, and substance abuse. The act of gambling can never be helpful to anyone, and it can have severe consequences for those who become addicted.

Lastly, let's consider the consumption of wine and other alcoholic beverages. While moderate drinking may have some health benefits, excessive drinking can lead to liver damage, heart disease, and addiction. Alcohol abuse is also associated with a range of social problems, such as violence, accidents, and family breakdowns. It is clear that drinking alcohol can never be helpful to anyone, and its harmful effects outweigh any potential health benefits.

So, why then is there a minimum age for indulging in such activities? The answer lies in the fact that these substances can be particularly harmful to young people. The adolescent brain is still developing, and exposure to these substances can have long-term effects on cognitive function, memory, and decision-making. Therefore, setting a minimum age for the consumption of tobacco, alcohol, and gambling is a protective measure to ensure that young people are not exposed to these harmful substances before their brains are fully developed.

However, it is important to note that simply setting a minimum age does not make these activities safe or beneficial. Rather, it is a legal restriction put in place to protect vulnerable individuals. It is up to individuals to make responsible choices and to be aware of the risks associated with these activities, regardless of their age.

In conclusion, smoking, gambling, and drinking wine can never be helpful to anyone. These activities are associated with numerous health and social problems, and their harmful effects outweigh any potential benefits. While a minimum age is prescribed for indulging in such acts, it does not make these activities safe or beneficial. Rather, it is a protective measure put in place to ensure that young people are not exposed to these substances before their brains are fully developed. It is up to individuals to make responsible choices and to be aware of the risks associated with these activities, regardless of their age.

The problem of small shop keepers

Life in the 21st century had become increasingly hectic. The pressures of work, social life, and personal responsibilities often left little time for physical activity. Yet, the importance of staying fit and healthy had never been greater. I knew this all too well. I worked long hours as a software engineer and spent most of my evenings and weekends catching up on chores and socializing with friends. It was hard to find time for exercise, but I knew it was important for my health.

That's why I decided to invest in an elliptical cross trainer for home use. It was the perfect solution for me - I could exercise whenever I had a spare moment, without having to leave my house. I had heard that Lajpat Nagar was a great place to shop for fitness equipment, so I decided to head there to make my purchase.

When I arrived at the address where the shop was supposed to be located, I was surprised to find that it had moved. I asked a few shopkeepers in the area if they knew where the store had gone, and eventually, I found out that it had moved to a different part of the market.

I made my way to the new location and found the shop. It was a small store, packed with exercise equipment of all kinds. The owner, a middle-aged man, greeted me with a smile and asked how he could help.

I told him I was looking for an elliptical cross trainer, and he led me to a section of the store where they were displayed. I tried out a few different models and settled on one that felt comfortable and sturdy.

As the shopkeeper was processing my payment, he shared a bit about his own struggles with running a small business in the market. He explained that each year, the rent for his shop increased by 10%, but his profit margins were not keeping up. As a result, he had to move his shop to a new location every 3 or 4 years in order to find a more affordable space.

I was saddened to hear about the challenges he faced. The market was bustling with shoppers, but I could see that many of the stores were small and cramped. It must be a constant struggle for these business owners to keep up with rising costs.

As I left the store, I couldn't help but reflect on the interconnectedness of our lives. My desire for a healthier lifestyle had led me to this small shop in Lajpat Nagar, and in doing so, I had learned about the challenges facing small business owners in the area. It made me realize that our actions - even the seemingly small ones - can have a ripple effect on others.

As I made my way home with my new elliptical cross trainer, I felt grateful for the opportunity to make a positive change in my own life, and for the chance to support a small business owner in the process. I knew that my hectic lifestyle would always be a challenge, but with a bit of determination and the right tools, I could make physical activity a part of my daily routine. And who knows - maybe one day, I'd be able to help other small business owners in my own way.

Uncle Sam Syndrome and Judiciary

The judicial system is the bedrock of any democracy. It is the system that ensures that everyone, irrespective of their social status, is treated fairly and justly. The judiciary is the guardian of the rule of law, and it is imperative that it operates with integrity, independence, and impartiality. However, the presence of nepotism and the Uncle Sam Syndrome in the judiciary can undermine the credibility of the entire system.

The notion that belonging to a family of judicial background does not guarantee success in law practice is a valid one. Success in the legal profession depends on various factors such as academic qualifications, legal knowledge, and experience, among others. It takes a great deal of hard work, dedication, and perseverance to succeed in the legal profession. Mere affiliation with a legal family background does not guarantee these qualities.

However, the issue is not about success in the legal profession but about the appointment of individuals to key positions in the judiciary. The appointment of judges and other key positions in the judiciary must be based on merit and not on familial ties. The appointment of individuals who lack the necessary qualifications and experience to hold these positions can have disastrous consequences.

Nepotism and the Uncle Sam Syndrome have the potential to undermine the integrity of the judiciary. The appointment of individuals who are not qualified or deserving of a particular position can lead to a conflict of interest. The individual appointed may not be impartial or objective in their judgments, which can lead to a miscarriage of justice.

A fair justice delivery system warrants that it should be free from any form of nepotism and the Uncle Sam Syndrome. The appointment of judges and other key positions in the judiciary should be made on the basis of merit and qualifications alone. The process of appointment should be transparent, independent, and free from any form of political influence.

Moreover, there needs to be greater accountability and oversight in the appointment process. Mechanisms should be put in place to investigate and penalize any instances of nepotism and the Uncle Sam Syndrome. This will help to ensure that the judicial system operates with integrity, independence, and impartiality.

The judicial system must be reflective of the society it serves. It must encourage diversity and inclusivity in its appointments, with a focus on ensuring representation from marginalized and underrepresented communities. This will help to ensure that the judiciary is more reflective of the society it serves and can better uphold the principles of justice and fairness.

The issue of nepotism and the Uncle Sam Syndrome in the judiciary cannot be ignored. The appointment of judges and other key positions in the judiciary must be based on merit and qualifications alone. The judiciary must operate with integrity, independence, and impartiality. The appointment process must be transparent, independent, and free from any form of political influence. Only then can the judiciary truly fulfill its role as the guardian of the rule of law and ensure that justice is delivered fairly and justly to all.